 |
 |
|
|
| Creation Versus Evolution Read this article please, before watching any videos |
Do you believe, that pro evolution science believers and teachers as well, know everything? That they have all the answers for the origins of life in the universe? We know they don't. And that's why they are doing always lab experiments and studding their own theories to find better answers ...Let's put it easier this same question. Do you believe, that maybe they know a half of everything? Again ...They don't. But let's be helpful and admit that yes, they know a half of all the mysteries of life in the Universe. Isn't this possible, fair and acceptable to admit that God is on the other half of knowledge that they don't know anything about yet? (by: Joel M.) Darwinism Simply Can't Answer These Questions By R. Geoffrey Weihe, D.D.S. of Tampa, Florida, past president of the Hillsborough County Dental Association. (Published on Tampa Tribune, on Sunday, June 01/2008) If you placed an infinite number of chimpanzees at an infinite number of typewriters, would they eventually write all the great books? That was a silly experiment proposed by Bob Newhart on his 1960 hit comedy album. The joke reminds me of today's debate over the teaching of intelligent design along with Neo Darwinistic scientific naturalism. The Tribune has published several columns that have misinformed readers about both science and creationism. Intelligent design did not begin in some Baptist Church strategy session. It grew out of the mind-numbing frustration felt by serious scientists concerning the increasing number of questions that Neo Darwinism just can't answer. The Darwinian account of evolution is imploding, and no amount of sarcasm or misinformation can save it. Those who hang their philosofical hopes on scientific naturalism are on defense mode. Let me share just three of the many problems unsolved by the theory of natural selection. 1- Random mutation, the heart of Darwin's theory, has been shown to be severely limited in evolving new functional genes. There is no known example of the formation of a new species. 2- The slow steps of evolution through selection cannot explain the irreducible complexity of the 40-piece rotary motor in the bacterial flagellum. If just one part of the motor is not in place, the motor won't work. No Darwinian apologist has an answer for this. 3- Neo Darwinists have yet to propose a solid theory for the beginning of life. Dr. Dean Kenyon, a professor of biology at San Francisco University, wrote the leading and accepted textbook on the biochemical origin of life. For years "Biochemical Predestination" was used in universities as the best text book on the origins of the first living cells. However, Kenyon finally abandoned his theory because he began to strongly doubt that amino acids, witch are protein's building blocks , could self-assemble without the assembly instructions that RNA and DNA provide. In the final analysis, there is no answer for the origin of DNA. Over 150 years ago, Darwin said: "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed witch could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." I ask that anyone commenting on this issue please not play the religion card. And I urge parents and students to seek the truth, wherever the evidence leads. Charles Darwin was a serious scientist who postulated a theory over 150 years ago. Let's welcome vigorous scientific scrutiny and not treat Darwinian evolution as a god. And let's check on what Newharts's chimps have written so far: "To be or not to be, that is the gizornimplat." By R. Geoffrey Weihe, D.D.S. of Tampa, Florida, past president of the Hillsborough County Dental Association. (Published on Tampa Tribune, on Sunday, June 01/2008) |
| Is this wise to take away the name of God from our school teachings? |
| .on this POLL |
| StarGateCode Live broadcast |
| StarGateCode Live broadcast |
|